How To Lengthen The Lifespan Of Your Home Espresso Machine

Once you bought the espresso machine in your house, you must be very excited with your new toy and must make a lot of cups of aromatic expresses. These coffees can be indeed a very good choke to a new day.

However, what a lot of users tend to forget is the regular maintenance of the house express maker that they bought. Although your machine cannot be also very used that the commercial express makers, it is again a vital step to prolong its life span. How do you assure that its due attention where to clean is interested is lent to your express machine so that you can continue to like your cup of espresso coffee every morning for a lot of mornings to come? Is below the summit 3 tips to help you.

1. Remove and wash the whole removable parts

After every use, it is important that you remove of the parts all removable of the espresso machine and wash them with soft soap and water. Dry them long before to put back. It is especially necessary if you don’t frequently use the machine. You don’t want to see the mildews that grow on the sides when you next opened in top the maker for use a few later!

2. of the weeks. the other Entirely clean parts

There will be some parts that cannot be removed of the maker for washing. However, it doesn’t mean that you let these parts only. You must use a clean humid cloth and stroke of cloth far the stains on these parts. Fundamentally, the part where the motor and the cavity resides in is the regions that you cannot wash with water, therefore you must take the note to clean them entirely after every use.

3. Fifteen of days or the monthly flush

It is important that you don’t carry away this to make leave once the machine at least by fifteen from days or to the very more, once per month. It will assure that the minuscule cracks and difficult other to reach some regions is as entirely cleaned.

All that you have a need to make to “make leave” the maker permit to the machine to cross through the process of the express manufacture with the plain just water. It means you will light the house express maker and permit him to fall drop by drop as if you make a cup of espresso coffee but without adding the powder of the necessary coffee. This assures that coffee stains in the interior parts of the machine is given the luck to be washed.

If on the first washing that you discovered that water became brownish as it falls drop by drop, cross it through the second time or even a third time so necessary. You should only get plain water as the final result if your express machine was already entirely washed.…

How Do You Mitre Cut A Crown Moulding

A miter saw is a saw used to make accurate crosscuts and miters in a workplace. Table saws, on the other hand, is used for woodworking and consists of a circular round blade driven by an electric motor. The blade protrudes through the surface of a table, which provides support for the material which is usually wood, being cut. The best compound miter saw on the other hands, can make a cross cut on any board of any length. It can also make a rip cut on a very short board that doesn’t exceed the cut length of the miter saw.

Generally, for cross cuts, if the wood is bulky and hard to move because of its weight, then the preference would be a mitre saw.

The Steps Following A Crown Moulding Include:

  • To make a scarf joint in the middle of a long run, start by placing the crown moulding upside down on mitre saw table; hold the moulding at the same angle as it will be installed.
  • Set blade at 45 degrees and make cut in two lengths of moulding to create a scarf joint.
  • To form an outside corner joint, set the saw blade at 45 degrees to the left; cut the first length of moulding.
  • Rotate saw to 45 degrees to the right and cut the second mating moulding piece.
  • For an inside corner joint, square-cut the first piece of moulding and butt it tight into corner.
  • Mitre-cut the second piece to 45 degrees.
  • Highlight the leading edge of the moulding with a pencil.
  • Cut along leading edge with a coping saw.
  • Smooth the cut edge with 100-grit sandpaper to create a tight joint.

Crown moulding refers to a large family of mouldings which are designed to gracefully flare out to a finished top edge. Crown moulding is generally used for capping walls, pilasters, and cabinets, and is used extensively in the creation of interior and exterior cornice assemblies and door and window hoods.

You’d love to read: Best Computer Desk For Home Office

In recent times, crown molding have generally made their appearance as mostly decorated plaster or wooden trim where walls meet ceilings.

A Jilted Lover Is Wooed Again By America

“Some view the US-Pakistan relationship as a temporary marriage of convenience,” Secretary of State Colin Powell wrote in an op-ed published in two Pakistani newspapers during his latest visit to the region. But, he sought to assure sceptical Pakistanis, “Our partnership is for the long term.”

Most Pakistanis’ response will be this: What worth do words last, when they so easily perish? Pakistan is the burnt child, made timid from previously dashed hopes, certain that the nuclear capability that it developed as a response to India’s own nuclear programe will someday be the cause for America declaring it an enemy state.

Washington has previously forgiven Pakistan’s failures in democracy whenever forgiveness served short-term American purposes – say, while enlisting Pakistan’s help in wars in Afghanistan against communists or terrorists, or while maintaining Pakistan as a cold war bulwark while neighbouring India aligned itself with the Soviet Union. But whenever the American need for Pakistan has been less urgent, congressmen and lobbyists punish Pakistan through neglect or ponderous sanctions.

The Bush administration has taken a pummelling for its simplistic moral clarity, and deservedly so. But when it comes to Pakistan, it is infinitely suppler in its moral discernment than many sanctimonious American critics of its South Asian policy.

It is easy to say that Pakistan must be punished for its rogue intelligence agents and generals who have allegedly supported Al Qaeda secretly or for its rogue scientists who have shared nuclear technology with leaders of other nations. It’s too easy to say that American aid should be pulled back due to Pakistan’s slowness in making democracy work. It’s too easy to demand that Pakistan’s military president be “pushed” to enact political reforms more quickly.

Navigating a consistent course of American action is difficult, because Pakistan is where easy answers go to die. But Powell is right to say that now is the time to bring a consistent pragmatism in forging a productive relationship with Pakistan – an insecure nation sporting some 50 nuclear weapons and a Rolodex filled with the names of would-be Osamas who want to prove they care about it more than America does.

Poverty claims nearly half of Pakistan’s 150 million citizens, and religious extremism has its own claim. Pakistan’s own leaders balance noble goals with a corrupted government machinery and hard-core religious elements. General Pervez Musharraf made power-sharing compromises in December that should have earned applause both from religious parties and pro-democracy forces – but for his trouble he endured two assassination attempts in rapid succession.

Granted, Musharraf should be prodded to deliver on his goals of reform, but he must not be pushed to his doom by zealous congressmen.

Furthermore, Americans must recognise the difference between aiding a citizenry and aiding a particular regime. Sanctions against Pakistan failed to deter its leaders from developing nuclear weapons in the 1990s, but did help destroy the future of millions of children. Ongoing congressional threats to pull billions in promised American aid if Musharraf doesn’t jump high enough are just as damaging. Pakistan’s swords must be pounded into ploughshares, and this will happen when funding allows its religious madrasas to become true educational institutions. This takes development money, unfettered by politics.

Since Musharraf led a military coup in 1999, he has disappointed some Western observers by seeming to cling to power longer than may be necessary; but he recently announced he’ll vacate the headship of the military by the end of 2004. He has been walking his own tightrope, modelling moderation and secularisation, pushing back extremists as much as possible without triggering a reactionary torrent, easing the country onto a surer path to effective democracy, and even exploring the possibility of relations with Israel. His reward should be sufficiently consistent support to make it worth his while to stay aligned with Washington while dodging assassins’ bullets.

Finally, the entire world community must help Pakistan and India to balance legitimate differences with common economic goals. Both hover at the border between disaster and prosperity, both are astoundingly rich in intellectual capital and cultural heritage, and both are hemmed in by poverty and mutual dislike. But their short-term safety and the world’s long-term well-being demand nothing less than the kind of attention given to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Iraq isn’t the future of political Islam: Pakistan is. Created 56 years ago as an explicitly Muslim nation, Pakistan is a microcosm of modern Islam, an untapped gold mine, an atomic mix of moderation and fanaticism, a hotbed of Muslim frustration – and above all, a more important laboratory for 21st century Islam than any other country. If Pakistan moves forward, so too will the world. It’s time it were given a sustained push in the right direction.

The writer is an independent Pakistani-American journalist who lives in Los Angeles. He contributed this article to The Jordan Times.

This article article originally appeared in the Wednesday, April 7, 2004 edition of the Jordan Times. It is used here with permission.…

New Poll Suggests Israelis And Palestinians Want Two States (Onevoice Report)

NEW YORK – In the midst of a stalled peace process in the Middle East, a new poll released today by the OneVoice Movement, an international grassroots peace movement equally represented both in Israel and in Palestine, provides a snapshot of Israeli and Palestinian public opinion and insights into how peace negotiations should move forward from now on.

With fieldwork conducted after the recent Gaza war and Israeli elections on 10 February, the poll engaged 500 Israelis and 600 Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza on final status issues and negotiations. The questions pushed beyond the usual, intransigent ‘yes’ or ‘no’ responses, attempting to get to the heart of what people on the ground are willing to accept and how they think the process should play out.

At the macro level, the findings indicate that the two-state solution remains the only resolution that is acceptable to the majority of both Israelis and Palestinians: 74 percent of Palestinians and 78 percent of Israelis would be willing to accept a two-state solution, while 59 percent of Palestinians and 66 percent of Israelis find a single, bi-national state to be unacceptable.

What’s more, Israelis and Palestinians are as convinced as ever that negotiations are the way to get there: 77 percent of Israelis and 71 percent of Palestinians find a negotiated peace to be either ‘essential’ or ‘desirable’.

Of course, that’s the macro view, and it’s not the whole story. The findings imply that mainstream Israeli and Palestinian populations have yet to acknowledge the significant concerns of the other side.

While the issue of greatest significance for Palestinians is freedom from occupation (94 percent deem it a ‘very significant’ problem in the peace process, ranking it the primary issue on the Palestinian side), only 30 percent of Israelis find it to be ‘very significant’, ranking the issue 15th on the Israeli list of priorities. Similarly, the primary issue for Israelis is stopping attacks on civilians (90 percent rate it a ‘very significant’ issue). This issue meets with 50 percent approval on the Palestinian side, but ranks as 19th in a list of 21 issues.

So how do we push past the impasse? How do we build consensus? And – perhaps most importantly – how do we ensure that this process doesn’t fail, like all the others? The poll gives us some interesting answers here, as well.

First and foremost, the poll reveals a clear desire for civic engagement in the peace process: ordinary Israelis and Palestinians not only want to be informed about the negotiations’ progress, they desire greater involvement in the process (58 percent of Israelis and 74 percent of Palestinians think civic involvement in the peace process is ‘essential’ or ‘desirable’).

Progress at the negotiating table is only one step in the process of reaching a realistic solution. An end to the conflict will only come when leaders reach an agreement that their peoples are ready to understand, accept and support. And this comes through civic education, true engagement of the grassroots.

Governments alone can’t take this on.

They need to work in tandem with civil society and grassroots organizations to ensure the true connection between the top-level negotiation process and the will of the citizens of all sides.

As part of this effort, OneVoice will be launching a Town Hall Meetings series throughout Israel and Palestine, which will start in May and continue throughout 2009. The meetings will build on the poll’s results to start critical discussions, highlight consensus where it already exists, and work toward consensus where there is none.

Resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not impossible; failure is not a foregone conclusion. The shape of an agreement is there, and there is a genuine possibility to work toward a compromise on even the toughest final status issues.

But without more attention to the process – without a genuine engagement of the people on the ground, who will have to live with whatever agreement is put down on paper – we will inevitably fall victim to the shortcomings and failures of the past.

And our children will have to pay the price.

Darya Shaikh is Chief Operating Officer of the OneVoice Movement. The poll was commissioned by OneVoice Israel and OneVoice Palestine in collaboration with the Institute of Irish Studies at the University of Liverpool. The fieldwork was undertaken by Arab World for Research and Development of Ramallah and Dahaf Institute of Tel Aviv. Download full polling report here: http://onevoicemovement.org/programs/documents/OneVoiceIrwinReport.pdf. This article was written for the Common Ground News Service (CGNews).…

Egyptian Authorities Release Detained Wheaton College Graduate

Philip Rizk, a Wheaton College graduate and a German-Egyptian dual citizen, was arrested by Egyptian authorities on Friday night, February 6th. Despite the Egyptian populace’s widely shared sympathy for the plight of Palestinian civilians, the Egyptian government has chosen to crack down on peaceful Gaza activists and demonstrators. Today, according to the facebook group set up by his family, Philip has been released.

According to the group notices: “Philip is out, he is safe and home with his family. He requests that all upcoming planned protests and marches still take place to end siege on Gaza.”

The incident begs the question of why Egypt would risk the threat of international protests to detain and silence the voice of one humanitarian advocate? Two views from the press:

From the Guardian:

Abducted in Egypt

The detention of protesters highlights Middle East governments’ ambivalent attitudes towards support for the Palestinians

By Ben White

Last Friday night, after a peaceful, small-scale march north of Cairo in solidarity with the besieged Palestinians of Gaza, Egyptian secret police kidnapped one of the event organisers, Philip Rizk. Philip is an Egyptian-German blogger, film-maker and activist, who had previously lived in Gaza for two years. As I write this, no one has yet received confirmation of his location or had any communication with him.

There are more detailed accounts of what happened on Friday and events since then on various blogs. The family, while desperately worried, have been working with local activists and friends abroad to mobilise a campaign for Philip’s release (the Facebook group attracted more than 2,500 members in the first two days).

However, Phil would be the first to point to the fact that what has happened to him is all too common in Mubarak’s Egypt. In fact, this “Mafia-style” abduction, and the Palestine focus of Philip’s work that made him a target for Egypt’s mukhabarat, draws attention to some larger developments in Egypt and the region.

Firstly, it is no coincidence that the Egyptian police chose to clamp down on a display (however modest) of both support for the Palestinians and opposition to Egypt’s policies towards the Gaza Strip and Israel. Even before Israel launched its assault on the Palestinians in Gaza, Mubarak was under pressure for helping to maintain the blockade on Gaza as Israel’s “siege” ground on. But Egypt became the target of particularly fierce anger once Operation Cast Lead had begun, as reports emerged of possible Egyptian collusion.

Read the Full Article

Van Spirits Away Protester in Egypt, Signaling Crackdown on Criticism Over Gaza

From the New York Times:

By Michael Slackman

CAIRO — State security came for Philip Rizk on Friday night. He had just finished a six-mile protest walk with about 15 friends to raise support for Palestinians in the Gaza Strip when he was detained for hours and then hustled into an unmarked van and driven off. He has not been seen or heard from since.

For two days the authorities denied that he was being held. Then on Sunday, at 10 p.m., a security official at the American University in Cairo, where Mr. Rizk studies, was able to confirm his arrest to his family. His mother and father tried to get some sleep, but at 1 a.m., security agents showed up at their door, five plainclothesmen and two guards carrying automatic weapons.

After searching their apartment, the security agents tried to take his father, Magid, away, too. He refused to go, and the authorities backed off when representatives of the German Embassy and Amnesty International arrived in the middle of the night. Philip Rizk’s mother, Judith, is German, and he has dual Egyptian-German citizenship.

“It’s like a bad movie,” Mrs. Rizk said.

The war in Gaza has left its mark in Egypt. The authorities here have been increasingly frustrated with criticism at home and abroad for refusing to fully open the border between Rafah and Gaza.

Read the Full Article